Ta for that. Broadly speaking I think it looks better, but I have a few problems. The old template (I thought) wasn’t amazing in any facet but wasn’t in any specific way nasty, either. With this one:
1) I can’t really define what I mean clearly, but it all seems too spaced out/too many gaps.
2) I’ve only recently started bothering with tags, but I don’t like the way there seems to be no gap between them and the actual post.
3) The fact that the designer has chosen to put ‘no comments’ all in lower case sickens me. I hope no-one stumbling across this thinks that it’s me who is too indolent to bother to use a shift key.
I may yet change back.
Little old me said, on 19 February, 2008 at 6:28 am
Yeah, this looks nicer.
Ta for that. Broadly speaking I think it looks better, but I have a few problems. The old template (I thought) wasn’t amazing in any facet but wasn’t in any specific way nasty, either. With this one:
1) I can’t really define what I mean clearly, but it all seems too spaced out/too many gaps.
2) I’ve only recently started bothering with tags, but I don’t like the way there seems to be no gap between them and the actual post.
3) The fact that the designer has chosen to put ‘no comments’ all in lower case sickens me. I hope no-one stumbling across this thinks that it’s me who is too indolent to bother to use a shift key.
I may yet change back.
I am still not sure, it’s got a cold feel to it
For what it’s worth, I thought the old design was friendlier.
But hey, my blog’s black with a heavy metal banner.
Today I learnt the definition of the word ‘indolent’.
Sugar, you more or less are the definition of the word ‘indolent’.
(Edit: I’ve just realised the relevance of that, a few days later).
I am listening to everyone else, by the way. I’m still very unsure about this new template.
And there’s nothing wrong with Heavy Metal banners.
Oh, I love my banner; I was just pointing out the irony of that fact juxtaposed with my mention of ‘friendliness’ before someone else did.